Paradraw

PostHog

posthog.com
11 published2 named, not published0 expected, not published22 relationships1058 clauses
Every legal document PostHog publishes, and the ones its own terms name that nobody published. Free to read.Other companies
mediumGap

TPS names a Agreement terms we could not find published

Terms, PostHog style cl. 3.6 refers to a Agreement terms. No page of that name appears in the sitemap, the legal index or the trust centre. It may exist and be available on request.

  • TPS cl. 3.6

    “3.6 Both parties will have the right to disclose the existence of the relationship between the parties, but not the terms and conditions of this Agreement or an applicable Order Form, unless such disclosure of the Agreem…”

Wrong? Ask for access to correct it.

mediumGap

PCDP names a Business Associate Agreement we could not find published

Privacy compliance - Docs - PostHog § yes refers to a Business Associate Agreement. No page of that name appears in the sitemap, the legal index or the trust centre. It may exist and be available on request.

  • PCDP § yes

    “Yes. A Business Associate Agreement (BAA) may be required for HIPAA-compliant use of PostHog Cloud, but a signed BAA does not make your setup compliant on its own. It does not cover every feature, and compliance also dep…”

Wrong? Ask for access to correct it.

lowRegister

The minimum age of a user is stated 4 times, in 2 different figures

The minimum age of a user appears in 2 documents. The figures stated are 18, 13. These may each be right for a different thing. What the corpus does not do is say which figure governs which question.

  • PP ¶61 — states 18

    “We don't collect any seriously sensitive information, like genetic or biometric data, and definitely no data on children under 18.”

  • PGCD ¶34 — states 13

    “Children under 13 can only give consent with permission from their parent”

Wrong? Ask for access to correct it.

Held back

26 readings, on top of the 3 above

Each puts two clauses side by side that answer the same question differently, and quotes both.

Accounts are invite-only for now. Leave an address and we will come back to you.

I work here

The drawing, in words

PostHog’s legal documents

PostHog publishes 11 legal documents. Its own terms name 2 more that we could not find published. Every cross-reference inside them resolves. Nothing says which document wins on a conflict. 1 figure is stated more than once, in more than one form.

Published 11

Named, not published 2

  • Agreement terms
  • Business Associate Agreement

Named in PostHog’s own terms and not found in its sitemap, legal index or trust centre. It may exist and be available on request.

How they connect 20

  • 9 times a document depend on another existing
  • 5 times a document cite another document
  • 4 times a document rely on a definition from another
  • 2 times a document incorporate another by reference

Read from posthog.com on 25 September 2026. A description of how the documents fit together, not legal advice. Is this your company?